Wisconsin

  Employment Attorney.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
July 20, 2010
Employment
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Employment Law News

 

New Legislation Protects Employees Participating In Union Activities

Protects against worker harassment, intimidation, or retribution for engaging in union activities

WASHINGTON -- In an effort to protect hundreds of thousands of employees who have faced harassment, intimidation, or retribution for engaging in union organizing activities, House Democrats today introduced the Employee Right to Choose Act. The bill simplifies workplace organizing by providing a simple, fair, direct method for workers to form unions by signing cards or petitions. The bill is a companion to one introduced this year by Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY).

“Unfortunately, an aggressive assault on American workers, and the institutions that represent them, has dangerously eroded union-organizing rights, resulting in a steady decline in the percentage of Americans in labor unions. We must take action in order to preserve this fundamental right of all employees to organize and take collective action in the workplace,” said George Miller (D-CA), senior Democrat of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, who along with Tim Bishop (D-NY) introduced the bill. Altogether, the bill has 16 original cosponsors.

Today, an aggressive assault on workers faces many union organizers: almost one-third of organizing campaigns end in employers illegally firing union supporters; more than half of employers subject to such organizing campaigns threaten to shut down a workplace if the union succeeds; 80% of employers respond to employees’ efforts to form a union by hiring outside consultants; 92% of employers force employees to attend closed-door meetings where they are pressured not to join.

"The truth is, too many hard-working Americans are actively subjected to threats and intimidation when they try to assert their right to start or support a union at their workplace,” Miller said. The law today unfairly advantages employers. We are introducing this Act today to address this unfair advantage.”

The Employee Right to Choose Act closes to the gap between workers and employers by amending the National Labor Relations Act to replicate the “card check” system currently in Canada. The Act would:


Simplify Workplace Organizing. The bill provides a simple, fair, direct method for workers to form unions by signing cards or petitions.

Protect Workers Engaging in Organizing Activity. Under the current system, employees seeking union representation first sign a petition that is sent to the NLRB as evidence that sufficient interest exists to justify an election. Unfortunately, this document is often used to harass people who have signed it. Under the bill, employers would not have an opportunity to see the list of union supporters before certification takes place.

Limit Employers’ Abilities to Union-Bust. Under the current system, once the NLRB has certified employee interest in organization, the workplace must wait 60 days before participating in an election. Many employers currently utilize those two months to engage in antiunion activities, such as “mandatory” work sessions and harassment. This legislation would essentially close that window for employers.

Facilitate First Contract Negotiation. This legislation sets hard time limits by which parties must begin and complete their negotiation of the first contract after union certification. If the parties fail to meet those deadlines, the bill would authorize involvement of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Board and, if necessary, a third-party arbitrator to force a first contract between the new union and its employer. This would eradicate the delaying tactics often used by employers during contract negotiation.


Contact our Wisconsin Employment Lawyer Now.

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
About Wrongful Termination employment
Wrongful termination is a term that generally refers to a person being fired illegally. Many terminations that people think of as "wrongful" aren't illegal. In most states, employment is "at will". This means that the employer can fire the employee for no reason or any reason. However, there are two main reasons why a termination may be illegal- discrimination and contracts.

 


  Newsroom  
 


Latest news about Employment cases in Wisconsin and nationwide:

U.S. Labor Department Cites Dover, Ohio, Pallet Manufacturer For Safety Violations
The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has proposed $157,200 in fines against Inca Presswood Pallets L...
Read more >


Wal-Mart Workers to Receive More Than $33M In Back Wages
The U.S. Department of  Labor announced today that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. will pay over $33 million in back wages to resolve issues that arose u...
Read more >


$637,000 Grant to Assist Dislocated Workers in Montana
WASHINGTON — U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao today announced a grant of $637,000, with an initial release of $238,872, to assist approximate...
Read more >


More Employment News >

 
 

Employment Attorney.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968

Definition:
Recipients of federal funding for law enforcement under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d, are prohibited by that statute from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.

Affirmative Action

Definition:
Proactive action to accomplish the purposes of a program which is designed to increase the employment opportunities of certain groups, which may involve goals, timetables, or specifically outlined steps to be undertaken to assure that objectives are reached.

Executive Order 11246

Definition:
Executive Order 11246, as amended, prohibits discrimination in employment by contractors with the federal government on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) of the U.S. Department of Labor is the federal agency responsible for investigating individual charges of discrimination under Executive Order 11246.

More Employment Attorney.com Terms >

 

Employment Resources

 


Search Employment resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Employment Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Employment:

  • Collective Bargaining
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Unemployment Compensation
  • Pensions
  • Workplace Safety
  • Worker's Compensation

More Employment Topics >

Wisconsin Employment Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Employment attorney you should contact our Employment Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Appleton
  • Beloit
  • Burlington
  • Chippewa Falls
  • De Pere
  • Eau Claire
  • Fond Du Lac
  • Franklin
  • Green Bay
  • Janesville
  • Kenosha
  • La Crosse
  • Madison
  • Manitowoc
  • Marshfield
  • Menomonee Falls
  • Milwaukee
  • Neenah
  • New Berlin
  • Oak Creek
  • Oconomowoc
  • Oshkosh
  • Racine
  • Sheboygan
  • Stevens Point
  • Sun Prairie
  • Superior
  • Waukesha
  • Wausau
  • West Bend
  • Wisconsin Rapids
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Wisconsin Employment Attorney.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.